"Sarbajit Roy" (via indiaresists Mailing List)
2018-03-22 03:44:53 UTC
The INC RTI cell has consistently refused to accept my RTI's concerning
public statements being made by their official spokespersons that Rahul
Gandhi is a Brahmin (2012) and that he is a Janeudhari Brahmin Hindu (2017).
Because INC is a public authority under RTI Act as held by Central
Information Commission, I had recently approached the Election Commission
to transfer my RTI to INC. The Election Commission CPIO after 3 months
replied to me and evaded transferring my RTI application to INC/AICC. The
ECI also says that they have no information about Rahul Gandhi's
parentage,religion, caste etc.
So it is high time that Hindustanis know certain facts about Mr. Rahul
Gandhi's false claims to be a Januedhari Hindu of Brahmin caste.
1) Rahul Gandhi's parents are apparently Shri Rajiv Gandhi and Shrimati
2) As per affidavits filed in Delhi High Court in 'Menaka Gandhi versus
Indira Gandhi and Anr' and finding of the single judge (later challenged in
LPA before DB), Shri Rahul Gandhi's brother "Sanjay" was a Parsi and not a
Hindu, and Menaka Gandhi (aka Maneka Gandhi) was quite aggrieved that.the
court had concluded that Sanjay Gandhi (who married Maneka under Special
Marriage Act) was a Hindu and not a Parsi merely on the say of Indira
Gandhi without allowing evidence to be led on this point. As per Maneka
Gandhi both she and her husband Shri Sanjay Gandhi were clear that their
intestate succession would not be under Hindu Succession Act but under
Indian Succession Act since late Shri Sanjay Gandhi was a Parsi and hence
their marriage under Special Marriage Act 1954.
NB: The definition of "Parsi" in the Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act 1936 is
for mariage between two Zorastrians, and it is nobody's case that Indira
Nehru was a Zorastrian at time of her marriage to enable a marrige under
Parsi Marriage Act 1936..
3) The LPA bench curiously observed that Shri Sanjay Gandhi was not a Parsi
because it was not proved he was a Zorastrian (ie. one who has Navjot
ceremony) and the Indian law is silent on who exactly is a Parsi. The LPA
court also observed that Sanjay Gandhi's father Feroze Gandhi was a Hindu
because he allegedly married Indira Nehru by "Vedic" rites. Of course the
court overlooked that Feroze Gandhi's mortal remains are buried in the
Parsi cemetry at Allahabad, and the Parsi community are notorious for not
allowing non-Parsis entry into their sacred places.
So it is very probable that
1) Shri Feroze Gandhi was a Parsi (Zorastrian) and his so-called marriage
with Indira Gandhi (a non-Parsi) by "Vedic" rituals was ILLEGAL unless it
is proved to be either (a) solemnised under Special Marriages Act 1872 or
(b) under ARYA Marriage Validation Act 1939 as a marriage between 2 Hindus.
2) There is no evidence of solemnisation of any marriage between Feroze
Gandhi and Indira Nehru under Special Marriage Act 1872, The marriage
register under SMA is a public document open to inspection by anybody and I
am reliably informed that nobody has seen any such record.
3) Feroze Gandhi could not have been a Hindu at time of his marriage (as
Arya Marriage Validation Act requires) because the Parsis do not accept
converts / reconverts and Feroze Gandhi was throughout a Parsi in his
lifetime as proved by his burial in the Parsi cemetry at Allahabad, and
declaration by his younger son Sanjay before the marriage officer that he
Indira Gandhi's biographer has also stated that the Vedic marriage between
Feroze and Indira was a sham and illegal in law.
I can disclose much more, but if any Ld. IAC member wants to correct me at
this stage please do so. I shall next examine the matter in context of
Hindu Code where 1 parent is a Hindu and child (legitimate or illegitimate)
is brought up as a Hindu. I shall also deal with the situation that Indira
Gandhi was not a Hindu but something else.